Can a member of the public buy a .pt here?
Its own page offers .pt through a Portuguese storefront, but on 2026-09-29 it printed no .pt price with its VAT treatment that this site could read, so it is listed on the Portugal page as read and not ranked.
Why it is not ranked
The table sits under a 'Preços sem IVA / Preços com IVA' switch whose state the text does not establish, so which figure is the .pt price with which tax treatment is not certain.
Namespaces on its own page
.pt.com.net.org
What its page printed
Price table with a 'Preços sem IVA / Preços com IVA' switch: 1 ano 16,26€ 13,82€ 16,26€ under .com .pt .net; footnote 'Aos valores apresentados acresce IVA à taxa legal em vigor salvo indicação contraria.'
Read from https://www.ptservidor.pt/dominios on 2026-09-29. A storefront read establishes the language, the currency and the figure the page printed that day. It does not establish support quality, uptime or what a renewal will cost next year.
How the Portugal storefronts were read
Eleven storefronts from DNS.PT's list of 108 registrars (seven pages, read in full on 2026-09-29) plus Hostinger's Portuguese storefront were opened in a real browser. PTisp returned HTTP 502, and dominios.pt, Webtuga and Lusoaloja printed no .pt price; PTServidor and WebHS print prices beside an IVA switch whose state is not stated. Three pages printed a .pt price in euros with its tax treatment, all excluding IVA. On 2026-10-15 the remaining 85 registrars on DNS.PT's list that publish a website were opened, so every registrar on the list with a published website has now been tried: 75 were read, 10 could not be, and 1 more prints a comparable .pt price.
FAQ
Is PTServidor accredited to sell .pt?
What does PTServidor charge for a .pt domain?
Has this site tested PTServidor?
Sources
- PTServidor's own storefront, read 2026-09-29
- DNS.PT accredited-registrar list, read 2026-09-29
- Accredited registrar directory, every company on a country registry's list
- Portugal page, every .pt storefront read, ranked by printed price
- /data/local-storefronts.json, this record, machine-readable
- /methodology/, why untested registrars carry no score