Kamy kommunikasjon AS
.no registrar in Norway, read from its own storefront on 2026-10-15
Can a member of the public buy a .no here?
Its own page offers .no through a Norwegian storefront, but on 2026-10-15 it printed no .no price with its VAT treatment that this site could read, so it is listed on the Norway page as read and not ranked.
Why it is not ranked
.no appears on the pages read, but no figure in NOK is printed beside it.
Namespaces on its own page
.no
What its page printed
Homepage "Kamy Kommunikasjon - IT selskap"; followed its "BESTILL DOMENE" link. .no appears: "Drømmen startet med et domene. Finn et navn som passer din bedrift, velg webhotell og du er snart i gang med å bygge drømmen. Et domenenavn er…"; no NOK figure within two lines of it.
Read from https://www.kamy.no/domene/ on 2026-10-15. A storefront read establishes the language, the currency and the figure the page printed that day. It does not establish support quality, uptime or what a renewal will cost next year.
How the Norway storefronts were read
Five Norwegian retail brands from Norid's accredited list plus the tracked registrars were opened in a real browser on 2026-09-28. Domeneshop's price list address returned 404 so only its front page was read; Webhuset's and Dedia's pages print no .no price; Syse redirects to Uniweb. On 2026-10-15 the remaining 231 registrars on Norid's list that publish a website were opened, so every registrar on the list with a published website has now been tried: 191 were read, 40 could not be, and 9 more print a comparable .no price.
FAQ
Is Kamy kommunikasjon AS accredited to sell .no?
What does Kamy kommunikasjon AS charge for a .no domain?
Has this site tested Kamy kommunikasjon AS?
Sources
- Kamy kommunikasjon AS's own storefront, read 2026-10-15
- Norid accredited-registrar list, read 2026-09-03
- Accredited registrar directory, every company on a country registry's list
- Norway page, every .no storefront read, ranked by printed price
- /data/local-storefronts.json, this record, machine-readable
- /methodology/, why untested registrars carry no score